Glenwood FY27 CDBG Sewer System Improvements

Statements of qualifications and proposals are being requested from engineering firms with a strong record in successfully assisting local governments with the implementation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) programs. Responding firms should be technically qualified and licensed in the State of Georgia to provide these services.
Plans are to contract for engineering preliminary design services required for a potential FY2027 CDBG project and, if funded, for architectural services for the implementation of the project. The purpose of the project is sewerage system improvements.
Information which should be submitted for our evaluation is as follows:

1. History of firm and resources
2. CDBG/EIP/RDF experience, including other DCA grant programs
3. Key personnel/qualifications
4. Current workload
5. Scope and level of service proposed
6. Experience with similar projects and list of references
7. Fees and/or Percentages (if any) associated with the Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) for the
   application, and Design and Construction Management Services, if the project is funded. The draft PER
   would be needed no later than January 20, 2027.
8. Errors and Omissions Insurance
9. Statement of Qualifications Form
   City of Glenwood also abides by the following laws as they pertain to HUD Assisted Projects: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, Title 1; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Fair Housing Act); Section 104(b)(2) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended; Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA); the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968; and the Build America, Buy America Act (BABA).
   Laurie Simpson, Senior Grant Administrator
   5405 Oak Street
   Eastman, GA 31023
   LSIMPSON@HOGARC.ORG
   912-244-2761

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
SCORING

CONTACT: ________________________
NAME OF FIRM: __________________________
FIRM ADDRESS: ___________________________________
Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each selected
criterion.
CIRCLE POINTS
CRITERION POOR GOOD EXCELLENT
POINTS
ASSIGNED

1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary
   for this project. 0 1 2
2. The Firm’s and Key personnel experience
   with this type of Project 0 1 2
3. Quality of reference information. 0 1 2
4. Has the Firm had experience with similar
   projects (provides examples)? 0 1 2
5. Is the price competitive? % 0 1 2
   TOTAL POINTS
   Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline? Yes No
   Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? Yes No
   REVIEW COMMENTS: ______________________________________________________________
   NAME & TITILE: ________________________________
   DATE OF REVIEW: ______________________________