Read the notice and its 1 attached document and pull out the scope, the deadlines and what you have to submit.
Montana DOT Advertised Bid Package 303 – Mill_creek_highway.
Alternative (design-build) contracting package. No fixed letting date is posted; see the bid package for the proposal schedule.
Highway construction work advertised by the Montana Department of Transportation. The bid-package ZIP carries the plans, specifications, and proposal documents for this project.
Construction Contracting Bureau
Phone: (406) 444–6212, 6215, or 6216
Fax: (406) 444–7236
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Engineering Division
TTY: (800) 335–7592
Web Page: www.mdt.mt.gov
2701 Prospect ▪ PO Box 201001
Helena MT 59620-1001Christopher Dorrington, Director
SOQ/TECHNICAL PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
Each voting member of the Technical Review Committee (TRC) will review and evaluate the SOQ or
Technical Proposal received. Individual TRC members will provide a ranking for each criterion based on a
0 to 10 scale, with 10 being best. The Scoring Weight assigned each criterion will be multiplied by the TRC
member Ranking and added together providing a maximum possible Total Score of 10,000 points per
member per SOQ/Technical Proposal. The SOQ or Technical Proposal will be evaluated based on the
following Scoring Guide and SOQ Evaluation Criteria Scoring Table.
SCORING GUIDE
(9.0-10.0): Response will be a highly comprehensive, excellent reply that meets all the requirements of
the areas within the specific criteria. In addition, the response covers areas not originally addressed in the
RFQ evaluation criteria and includes additional information and recommendations that would prove both
valuable and beneficial to MDT. This response is an excellent standard, demonstrating the Firm’s superior
knowledge and understanding of the project.
(7.5-8.9): This response demonstrates an above average performance with few minor deficiencies noted.
Response will provide useful information, while showing experience and knowledge within the evaluation
criteria. The response is well thought out and addresses most of the requirements set forth in the RFQ. At
the discretion of the reviewers, minor omissions in the requirements may be waived but considered in
the assigned scores.
We post new asphalt opportunities in Montana as agencies publish them. Get them in one email — free, and unsubscribe whenever.
Most Montana work asks for the two below, and the solicitation documents are where it’s stated. One prequalification covers both — on this bid and the next.
A surety’s written statement that it expects to bond you up to a stated amount, subject to final underwriting. It’s what a GC or agency asks to see before they take your bid seriously.
Source: Montana Department of Transportation (solicitation ALT-303), retrieved via a public procurement portal. View the official posting, and always confirm requirements and deadlines with the issuing agency.
